Independent journalism on sound, waves and healing · updated daily

Wednesday, October 28, 2026 · The Sunday letter

UConn finds an ear protein raised in the blood of tinnitus patients

Prestin, the motor protein of the inner ear’s amplifier cells, ran higher in tinnitus patients across 171 participants, though not reliably enough to diagnose anyone.

Abstract wave illustration for: UConn finds an ear protein raised in the blood of tinnitus patients

The short version

  • Two University of Connecticut studies, with 89 and 82 participants, found higher blood levels of the inner-ear protein prestin in people with chronic tinnitus than in people without it.
  • In the second study the gap held after adjusting for age, hearing thresholds and a week of measured noise exposure, and three other ear proteins showed no difference.
  • The test is not accurate enough to diagnose tinnitus, and both studies are small and come from the same lab.

Tinnitus has no objective test. A clinician can measure a patient’s hearing, but the ringing itself exists only in the patient’s report. Two studies from UConn Health, announced by the university on October 6, suggest that a trace of it may show up in a blood sample.

The marker is prestin, a motor protein in the outer hair cells of the cochlea, the cells that amplify incoming vibration and sharpen hearing. In the first study, in Otology & Neurotology, a form of the protein was higher in 49 people with chronic tinnitus than in 40 controls. The second, in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, compared 41 people with chronic tinnitus in both ears with 41 controls, each given hearing tests, a week wearing a personal noise dosimeter and a blood draw. Prestin was again higher in the tinnitus group after adjusting for age, hearing thresholds and noise exposure (P = .003). Otoferlin, connexin 26 and stereocilin, three other inner-ear proteins, did not separate the groups.

“Our work now says there is promise in using prestin as a biomarker for tinnitus,” said Kourosh Parham, the UConn Health professor of surgery who is senior author of both papers.

Promise is the right word. New Atlas, which read the second paper, reports that the average gap was 330 picograms per milliliter, that it was not accurate enough to diagnose an individual, that prestin levels did not track how severe a person’s symptoms were, and that most participants had mild tinnitus. Prestin also turns up outside the ear, including in heart tissue. Both studies are small case-control comparisons from one lab, funded by an American Tinnitus Association grant, and Parham’s team says larger ones come next.

Audient reports on research and practice; it is not medical advice. Sound-based practices are generally low-risk, but people with epilepsy, implanted devices, hearing conditions or a history of trauma should check with a clinician first.

The Audient letter

One good read about sound, every week.

The research that held up, the practice worth trying, the place worth hearing — in one short email on Sunday evening. No hype, no supplements, unsubscribe in one click.

Weekly. Free. Your address is used for this letter and nothing else.

New here? Start with the basicsThe physics and the physiology, plainly

All explainers →