Independent journalism on sound, waves and healing · updated daily

Wednesday, October 28, 2026 · The Sunday letter

Music did not amplify LSD’s effect on the brain in a Montreal study

In 17 volunteers scanned with and without ambient music, the researchers expected music to deepen the drug’s effect and found a weak trend the other way.

Illustration for: Music did not amplify LSD's effect on the brain in a Montreal study

The short version

  • In a placebo-controlled study of 17 volunteers, LSD pushed brain activity toward a more complex, less orderly pattern.
  • The team expected ambient music to strengthen that effect, but the trend ran the other way and did not survive statistical correction.
  • The lead author calls the music result exploratory and says it should not be over-interpreted.

A team at the Université de Montréal expected music to deepen LSD’s effect on the brain. Their study, published in Communications Biology, did not find that. Seventeen healthy volunteers came in twice, 14 days apart, and received 75 micrograms of LSD or a saline placebo by injection, in counterbalanced order, without being told which. About four hours later, the team recorded their brain activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) for two 7-minute stretches: eyes closed in silence, and eyes closed while listening to ambient music.

The main result concerned the drug. LSD pushed brain signals toward a more fractal, complex state. The music result was the surprise. “We hypothesized that music potentiates the effect of the drug,” the lead author, Venkatesh Subramani, is quoted by PsyPost. “Somewhat surprisingly, and albeit not statistically robust, we found the opposite trend.” With music on, the drug’s signature was slightly weaker than in silence. The authors suggest music may give attention something outside to hold on to. None of the music effects survived correction across the whole brain.

That is a weak signal from 17 people, one dose and 7 minutes of listening, and Subramani says it “should not be over-interpreted.” We could not read the journal page, which sat behind a login, so this account rests on PsyPost’s report of the paper.

Audient reports on research and practice; it is not medical advice. Sound-based practices are generally low-risk, but people with epilepsy, implanted devices, hearing conditions or a history of trauma should check with a clinician first.

The Audient letter

One good read about sound, every week.

The research that held up, the practice worth trying, the place worth hearing — in one short email on Sunday evening. No hype, no supplements, unsubscribe in one click.

Weekly. Free. Your address is used for this letter and nothing else.

New here? Start with the basicsThe physics and the physiology, plainly

All explainers →